Platform

Platform overview How it works Authorization testing Evidence & reports Private scanning Integrations

Solutions

Security agencies Product teams Regulated industries Partner programme

Learn

Blog Knowledge hub Compare

Resources

Pricing Documentation Help centre FAQ Security & data What we haven’t proved

Company

About Contact Careers Sign in to the platform Start a $199 pilot →

Home / Knowledge hub / Fraud detection

Knowledge hub

Fraud detection

Spotting abuse of your business by patterns in behaviour, devices and payments.

Illustration explaining Fraud detection

What it means

Fraud detection is the set of checks that decide whether an action looks like genuine use or abuse of your business. It scores sign-ups, logins, orders and payouts from signals such as device, location, speed, spending pattern and history, then allows, challenges or blocks.

It differs from ordinary security because the fraudster often uses your product exactly as designed. There is no exploit to patch. Detection looks at behaviour across many events, which is why it sits beside, not inside, the checks that guard a single request.

Why it matters

Fraud is paid for directly: chargebacks, stolen goods, rewards paid out, and compute spent on accounts that never pay. Card networks also monitor dispute levels, and a merchant with too many may face extra fees or lose the ability to take cards.

Detection that is too loose lets abuse through; too tight and it blocks real customers, which costs sales and support time. The balance needs measuring. Done well, it complements rate limiting and account takeover defences rather than replacing them. It also needs regular review as fraudsters change tactics.

How it shows up

You meet it at sign-up, sign-in, checkout, withdrawal and any reward claim. Typical pieces are rules (more than three cards in an hour), device and network reputation, velocity limits, address and identity checks, and models trained on past cases. Many teams buy a service and add their own rules for their own product.

The repeated mistakes are a tool that scores but does not feed the decision, rules nobody reviews as fraud changes, and logs too thin to investigate with. Test it by behaving badly on purpose, in a safe environment, and see what is noticed. Detection is not a substitute for fixing business logic flaws.

Questions people ask

Fraud detection, answered

Is fraud detection part of application security?

It overlaps. Application security stops requests that break the rules of your code. Fraud detection looks at behaviour that follows the rules but still harms the business. A mature team needs both, and each covers a gap the other leaves.

Can fraud detection replace fixing logic flaws?

No. If a flaw lets someone redeem a code twice, detection might notice afterwards, but the flaw remains. Fix the cause where you can, and use detection to catch what rules cannot express.

Do we need machine learning for it?

Not to start. Clear rules on velocity, mismatched details and known bad patterns catch a lot. Models help once you have enough labelled cases and volume. Whatever you use, you need to explain a decision when a real customer is blocked.

How do we measure whether it works?

Track how much fraud is caught, how much slips through, and how many genuine customers are wrongly blocked. Dispute and chargeback rates are a lagging check. Review a sample of both blocked and allowed events regularly.

How do we test fraud controls?

Run controlled abuse in a test or staging setup: many sign-ups from one device, repeated card tries, rapid reward claims. Note which alerts fire, how fast, and whether the response happens. A control that only logs may not be enough.

Cyberlop mark

Would you notice the abuse?

Detection only matters if the flows underneath it hold. We test the business flows behind it, such as sign-up, checkout and rewards, and report what we proved. Ask us to run it on one of your applications.

Or start with a $199 pilot on one application: thirty days, success criteria agreed before day one, credited against the annual if you convert.