Platform

Platform overview How it works Authorization testing Evidence & reports Private scanning Integrations

Solutions

Security agencies Product teams Regulated industries Partner programme

Learn

Blog Knowledge hub Compare

Resources

Pricing Documentation Help centre FAQ Security & data What we haven’t proved

Company

About Contact Careers Sign in to the platform Start a $199 pilot →

Home / Knowledge hub / Software composition analysis

Knowledge hub

Software composition analysis

Inventorying your open-source parts and flagging the ones with known flaws.

Illustration explaining Software composition analysis

What it means

Software composition analysis, or SCA, lists the open-source and third-party components in your application, including the ones your dependencies pull in, and checks each version against databases of known vulnerabilities and licence terms. It reads manifests and lockfiles, and sometimes the built code.

Most modern applications are mostly other people's code. A team writes a small part and installs the rest. SCA answers a plain question: of everything we ship, what has a published flaw? It does not examine your own code, which is the job of other tools.

Why it matters

A single vulnerable library can expose every app that uses it, and attackers watch for new advisories and scan for them within days. Knowing what you ship is what lets you respond when a flaw is announced. Without a list, teams spend the first day, the most valuable one, just finding out which applications are affected.

Customers and regulators now ask for it, often alongside an SBOM. It also feeds patch management. The catch is noise: many flagged flaws sit in code your app never calls, so results need ranking before anyone is asked to fix them. A list of four hundred findings gets ignored; a list of ten that matter gets done.

How it shows up

You meet it in the pull request, the build pipeline and the repository. The repeated problems are scanning only direct dependencies and missing transitive ones, a report nobody reads, and findings marked critical regardless of whether the vulnerable function is used. Teams then ignore the tool.

Scan on every change and on a schedule, include transitive dependencies, and use a lockfile so the scan matches what ships. Rank by exploitability and reachability, then fix by upgrading or replacing. A known-vulnerable component that can be reached from the internet should come first.

Questions people ask

Software composition analysis, answered

What is the difference between SCA and SAST?

SCA checks the third-party components you use against known vulnerabilities. SAST analyses the code you wrote for weaknesses. They find different kinds of problems, they do not overlap much, and most teams use both together.

What is a transitive dependency?

It is a package your dependency depends on, not one you chose yourself. Most vulnerable components arrive this way, so a scan that only reads your direct list misses much of what you ship.

Why does SCA report so many findings?

Because a component may carry a published flaw in a function your code never uses. The tool matches versions, not behaviour. Reachability analysis and testing the running app show which findings can be exploited.

Is SCA the same as an SBOM?

No. An SBOM is an inventory of components. SCA uses an inventory to look for known vulnerabilities and licence issues. They work together, since SCA can read or produce an SBOM.

Where do the vulnerability databases come from?

Common sources include the National Vulnerability Database, the GitHub Advisory Database and OSV. Tools combine them, and coverage differs between ecosystems and languages, so any single source can miss things that another one lists.

Cyberlop mark

Which flagged flaw can be reached?

SCA lists what is known to be vulnerable. We test whether a flaw can be exploited in your running app and report only what we proved, so you can fix the real ones first. Book a pilot on one app.

Or start with a $199 pilot on one application: thirty days, success criteria agreed before day one, credited against the annual if you convert.